-
Recent Posts
Archives
Categories
- ARMED FORCES OF MALTA
- barber salon hairdressing
- British Monarchy
- GEEKY OR TECHIE GADGET STUFF
- GENERAL OBSERVATIONS & THOUGHTS
- History of Maltese Photography
- Island Fortress
- JOKES, HUMOUR, AND OTHER WIT
- Kevin Casha
- Malta
- MUSIC
- MUSIC
- MY PIC SNAPS
- MY VIDEO WORK
- photographer
- photographers
- photographs
- PHOTOGRAPHY
- photos
- Sci- Fi Science Fiction
- Scouts, Scouting, Scout, The Malta Scouts Association, TSAM
- Second World War
- Star Trek
- Uncategorized
- Valletta
- WORLD MILITARY
Meta
May 2026 M T W T F S S 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Tag Archives: risk management
Malta’s Drone Blindspot: Neutrality Is Not a Defence Strategy
Malta is still treating drones as if they’re a future problem, when the rest of Europe has already moved on. Airports abroad are being disrupted, energy sites probed, borders tested — and the EU has responded with detection grids, counter‑UAV doctrine, and rapid‑response layers. Meanwhile, we’re still arguing about neutrality as if a hostile drone will stop mid‑air to read our Constitution.
We have one airport, one main port, one power station, a few desalination plants, and a handful of subsea cables. A single drone incident in any of these would hit the whole country. That’s not drama; it’s maths.
Neutrality never meant refusing sensors, refusing training, or refusing the ability to detect a threat before it’s overhead. It meant staying out of alliances — not staying blind.
Europe adapted. The threat arrived. We’re the only ones still standing still.
Continue reading
Posted in GENERAL OBSERVATIONS & THOUGHTS
Tagged AFM, Air Defence, Air Defence Artillery, airport security, ARMED FORCES OF MALTA, Aviation Security, Civil Military Cooperation, Counter Drone, Counter UAV, Critical infrastructure, Cyber Physical Security, defence policy, Defence Readiness, Desalination Plants, Drone Incidents, Drone Threats, energy security, EU Defence, European Defence Agency, Infrastructure Protection, MALTA, Malta Discussion, Maltese Security, maritime security, Mediterranean security, National Resilience, national security, Neutrality, PESCO, policy debate, Port Security, Power Station Security, Public Safety, risk management, Security Debate, Security Policy, Situational Awareness, Small State Vulnerabilities, strategic planning, Subsea Cables
Leave a comment
Spectacle Over Strategy: How Mixed Signals Hurt the Iran Campaign Promises, U-Turns, and the Price of Overclaiming in the Iran Conflict
We argue that the campaign against Iran has too often favored spectacle over steady judgment, with shifting goals, public boasts that outpaced facts, and sudden policy reversals that weakened leverage and raised real risks. We examine leadership and military management missteps, the danger of premature victory claims, and practical steps to restore credibility and match means to ends. Readable and direct, it leaves you with a simple test: do leaders say what they can actually deliver or are we buying headlines at a high cost Continue reading
Posted in GENERAL OBSERVATIONS & THOUGHTS
Tagged accountability, air operations, aircraft loss, allied trust, analysis piece, blockade debate, carrier operations, civil military relations, coalition relations, command and control, contingency planning, credibility gap, crisis leadership, deadline changes, defense communications, deterrence strategy, diplomatic space, economic measures, editorial opinion, escalation risk, Gulf shipping, Hegseth, intelligence failures, Iran conflict, long term strategy, maritime security, media scrutiny, Middle East policy, military leadership, mixed signals, national security, operational planning, overclaiming, policy reversals, political rhetoric, press briefings, public messaging, regional stability, rescue operation, risk management, sanctions policy, strategic clarity, strategic mistakes, supply chain impact, tactical versus strategic, Trump administration, U turns, victory claims, war department
Leave a comment
A new patrol boat stuck on the slipway says more about us than about steel
A €50 million patrol boat has sat grounded for a year — and that says more about how we buy and sustain capability than about the steel itself.
A brand-new patrol vessel bought to protect our waters remains unusable after a year ashore. The story points to failures in handover testing, spare parts and logistics, and training, and it asks who is accountable for turning expensive hardware into real, day-one capability.
€50M patrol boat grounded for a year, with faults, poor sustainment planning and training delays leaving a costly asset idle and patrol coverage reduced. Continue reading →